Franklin Kury: 2 Jars of Water and a Lasting Environmental Legacy for Pennsylvania

As a Keystone State legislator, Franklin L. Kury drafted the Environmental Rights Amendment (ERA) and was a principal co-author of the Clean Streams Law.
By B.J. Small, Chesapeake Bay Foundation-PA

When the federal Clean Water Act was established 50 years ago to regulate pollution to the country’s rivers and streams and set quality standards for surface waters, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania already had a Clean Streams Law and an Environmental Rights Amendment (ERA) to its Constitution on the books.

As a Keystone State legislator, Franklin L. Kury drafted the ERA and was a principal co-author of the Clean Streams Law.

“Franklin Kury has left an amazing legacy for this Commonwealth. In 1966, his campaign slogan was ‘for clean streams and clean politics.’ A rare slogan today, but it was a promise he kept to the Commonwealth as this led to his landmark legislation. The amendment gives Pennsylvanians a Constitutional right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic, and esthetic values of the environment for citizens today as well as future generations.”

Trisha Salvia, Chesapeake Bay Foundation Staff Attorney in Pennsylvania

A Democrat, Kury served in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives from 1966 to 1972 and the Pennsylvania Senate from 1972 to 1980.

His political life was ignited in 1966 by clean streams legislation, when his would-be opponent voted against an amendment that would bring the coal companies under the Clean Streams Law already on the books.

AMD in Pennsylvania

It was then that a picture taken by his wife Elizabeth, showing two jars of water taken from a creek near Sunbury, Northumberland County, changed the fortunes of Kury and clean water. One jar had dirty water in it, the other had clear water.

The image and the issue got Kury elected.

“My wife took that picture to illustrate the issue. I had no thought of a constitutional amendment at that time. I just wanted to get in there and do something about clean streams.”

Franklin Kury

Representative Kury helped draft part of an overall restructuring of Pennsylvania’s water law, and it was signed in 1970.

Kury, 85 and a retired attorney, grew up in Sunbury around the Susquehanna River, and now lives in Hummelstown, Dauphin County.

He fathered the Environmental Rights Amendment when the environmental tide in the Pennsylvania legislature was never higher.

“People woke up to the fact that they had been exploited by the different coal and steel companies and others. We passed 12 or 15 bills; more bills for the environment in that time period (1968-72) than any time in the history of the state before or since.”

Franklin Kury

While serving on the House Conservation Committee, Kury read about the State of New York amending its constitution for a special provision on forest law, and the idea for an amendment hit him.

“With all these bills we were considering, bills could be repealed or amended, but a constitutional amendment will stay forever. I had a good course in constitutional law, in law school, and was also a smart-enough politician to know this was the time to do it.”

Franklin Kury

His draft of an Environmental Rights Amendment to Pennsylvania’s Constitution went through some changes as it was passed by the House and Senate.

The amendment reads– 
“The people have a right to clean air, pure water, and to the preservation of the natural, scenic, historic and esthetic values of the environment. Pennsylvania’s public natural resources are the common property of all the people, including generations yet to come. As trustee of these resources, the Commonwealth shall conserve and maintain them for the benefit of all the people.”

Article 1, Section 27

 It was enacted on the first Earth Day in 1970 and ratified by Pennsylvania’s voters by a 4-1 margin a year later on May 18, 1971.

“I feel good about my legislative experience. But this gives me the most satisfaction.”

Franklin Kury

The University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School called it the strongest environmental amendment in the country.

New York passed an Environmental Rights Amendment in 2021. Advocates in Maryland are calling for an amendment as well.

The ERA declares the people’s right to a clean environment and makes government the trustee of public natural resources.

“It means the average person has a right to a clean and healthy environment, and if they see a violation they have standing to go to court and challenge that. That has happened a number of times.”

Franklin Kury

A trustee is defined as every state official.

“Everybody who takes an oath to uphold the Constitution. You cannot take a public office without swearing to uphold the Constitution. That means you are swearing to uphold the Environmental Rights Amendment.”

Franklin Kury

Are the trustees of these resources living up to the Environmental Rights Amendment?

“I think in the legislature some members are very keen on it, others are not. As a body I’d say they’re not. The overall sense we had to pass the amendment in 1971 is gone. It’s dissipated.”

Franklin Kury

Kury says the beauty of the amendment as it is written, is the trust provision and the right of the public.

“They have the right to go to court and challenge an action. That is lacking under any other circumstance.”

Franklin Kury

Although climate change was not seen in 1971 as the threat it is today, the author says the amendment as written covers it.

“Climate change is an immediate threat to our survival. Nobody heard of it back then. I drafted it in broad language. Because we wrote it in a broad principle of law, it applies to climate change, as well it should. Climate change creates an unhealthy environment. So, it is very important that we use this amendment to fight climate change.”

Franklin Kury

Kury’s book, The Constitutional Question to Save the Planet: The Peoples’ Right to a Healthy Environment, was published in 2021. 

He says the book’s message is that the principles of Article 1, Section 27 can be the basis for stopping climate change and getting the government to act on the people’s side, not the side of the fossil fuel industry.

“The amendment is an effective tool to advocate for good conservation improvements or to defend against bad practices, especially in the fight for clean water and climate change. Pennsylvania is blessed to have a powerful Environmental Rights Amendment in our Constitution that lets its citizens fight to protect our natural resources for future generations.”

Trisha Salvia

Kury would like to see Pennsylvania’s Environment Rights Amendment applied beyond Commonwealth borders and adopted into the U.S. Constitution.

“The U.S. Constitution is totally silent when it comes to the environment. I’m very disappointed that we can’t get that done. If this was in the federal Constitution, it would make a real change because American citizens could sue the government for not carrying out their obligations to the environment. The main thing is, if the countries of the world—United States, India, China, European Union—if we got together on the Article 1, Section 27 principles, we would not have to worry about our environmental future here on Earth. It’s a tall order, but we’ve got a big problem. We have no choice but to try.”

Franklin Kury

[For more on Chesapeake Bay-related issues in Pennsylvania, visit the Chesapeake Bay Foundation-PA webpage.  Click Here to sign up for Pennsylvania updates (bottom of left column).  Click Here to support their work.

[Also visit the Keystone 10 Million Trees Partnership to learn how you can help clean water grow on trees.

[CBF has over 275,000 members in Bay Watershed.

[How Clean Is Your Stream?

[Check DEP’s 2022 Water Quality Report to find out how clean streams are near you.]

(Reprinted from the Chesapeake Bay Foundation Blog)



How the Clean Water Act fixed the Delaware River’s pollution problem


Despite Turmoil in Energy Markets, the Shift to Clean Energy Is Gaining Steam

BBB Scam Alert: “Free solar panels” can cost you big time! How to spot a phony offer

‘Water Batteries’ Could Power 135,000 Homes in San Diego

Renewable Investments Could Outstrip Upstream Oil And Gas In 2022

Weeks: Electric rates are spiking in NH. Do renewables help or hurt?

Leave a Reply