7 Questions to Ask Candidates about Gas Development & Public Health

Environmental Health Project Blog

(Note: Images and Bob’s comments have been inserted into the original blog found here)

If you’re like most people, you want to be healthy. You want pure drinking water and clean air. You want rivers, streams, and oceans that are not polluted. You want healthy families and children. Well, your environment impacts all these health factors.

Election Day 2022 is approaching us. Like every election, this one matters. The reality is that your vote helps shape the policies that impact both your life and the lives of the people and communities you love and value. On November 8, electors will vote on governors and U.S. senators and representatives as well as many other key federal, statewide, and local officials. Read on to see how you can be better prepared to vote for candidates committed to defending public health in the face of shale gas development.

What is shale gas development and why does it matter?

Shale gas development (also known as “unconventional gas development,” “hydraulic fracturing,” or “fracking”) is a method of removing and processing fossil gas from shale formations. This relatively new technology introduces horizontal drilling to the process and features high-pressure water mixed with chemicals and fine sand to fracture the rock and unlock previously inaccessible gas (largely methane). Shale gas development comprises other operational stages, including flaring gases, eliminating wastewater, transporting gas through pipelines dotted with compressor stations, and separating out usable components at processing plants.

Shale gas development directly impacts the quality of life of you and the people and communities that you love and care about. Peer-reviewed studies indicate a range of adverse health impacts that increase with proximity to shale gas facilities. The studied impacts include:

  • Asthma and upper and lower respiratory complaints
  • Hospitalizations for heart failure and mortality from heart attacks
  • Low birth weights, intellectual and developmental disabilities, and infant mortality
  • Congenital heart defects and neural tube defects
  • Headaches, fatigue, and skin rashes
  • Stress, anxiety, depression, and other mental health symptoms
What can you do?

Now is the time to ask candidates about their positions on shale gas development and public health. You can reach out to incumbents as well as their opposition via the following methods:

You can call, write a formal letter, or send an email. Be sure to indicate that you live in the individual’s district or potential district. Also, include a means for the office to respond to your issues and concerns.

Bob’s question: Do you want someone who doesn’t respond, or someone who is very clear on his positions? Here are the two major candidates for U.S Senate in Pa:
Oz is ‘the man behind the curtain‘ with zero political experience.

Source: LWV Voter’s Mini-Guide

Q: What measures, regulations, or acts, if any, would you support to mitigate climate change?
A: Climate change is an existential threat, and we need to transition to clean energy as quickly as possible. I have never taken a dime from the fossil fuel industry, and I never will. It’s a totally false choice that we have to choose between jobs and a clean environment. We can have both, that’s why I am always going to fight for creating thousands upon thousands of good-paying green union jobs as we transition, all while increasing our energy independence. My plan for the transition to clean energy starts with immediate investments into research and development and innovation; expanding renewable energy sources; and ensuring clean transportation infrastructure; and investing in environmental justice measures.

John Fetterman – “we need to transition to clean energy as quickly as possible. I have never taken a dime from the fossil fuel industry, and I never will.”
What questions should you be asking candidates about shale gas development and public health?
  1. What is your position on shale gas development?
  2. How will you improve the current laws, policies, and regulations to ensure the safest environmental and public health practices?
  3. How will you improve the water, air, and health in communities that are located near polluting sites such as shale gas development?
  4. What is your position on setbacks (distances between shale gas facilities and homes, schools, and businesses) and why?
  5. How will you incorporate current public health data and research in your decision making around shale gas development?
  6. How will you ensure consistent and accurate monitoring of shale gas development sites and reporting to communities, and what remediation do you propose when there are health, environmental, or safety breaches?
  7. How do you plan to address the negative environmental and health aspects of blue hydrogen (what the SGD industry now calls “clean hydrogen”) development?
Have my questions been answered?

It probably wouldn’t surprise you to know that candidates can be good at evading issues, at sounding like they have answered your questions when, in fact, they haven’t. For example, a candidate might say, “We need the good jobs shale gas development provides, so I support it.” At that point, we need to ask, “Okay, sure. People need to make a living. But can’t the industry do a better job of reducing emissions so that my kids are better protected? Should a leaky valve or subpar monitoring really put my family’s health at risk? What price do you put on public health?”

Or a candidate might say, “The industry says shale gas development is safe, so it must be. Besides, the government has rules about emissions that protect people.” Here, we might say something like, “Should we really trust any industry to regulate itself? No industry has ever successfully done so. Plus, state and federal emission guidelines are not safe standards. They are meant to give industry a potentially achievable goal, but they do not prevent people from being exposed to levels of pollution that are sometimes harmful to them.”

Be wary of the answers you get from candidates. Do your research and get your information from multiple reliable sources. Compare answers from competing candidates and decide which ones truly promote your best interests and those of your family.

It is critical that state and local officials understand the potential local public and environmental impact of shale gas development in their communities throughout the cycle of shale gas production. Importantly, the answers they provide to your questions should demonstrate a thorough understanding of actionable policy interventions that protect public and environmental health, a willingness to pivot to safer practices as they become available, and a consideration that providing diverse economic opportunities for residents is better than relying on one short-term cash stream.

For additional information about how and where to vote, visit this link.

The Environmental Health Project (EHP) is a nonprofit public health organization that assists and supports residents of Southwestern Pennsylvania and beyond who believe their health has been, or could be, impacted by shale gas development (SGD).




Gov. Tom Wolf signs $2 billion tax package that encourages natural gas production in Pa.
Ninety cents out of each dollar offered will be used to encourage the use of natural gas, including $1 billion in tax incentives to attract a new “hydrogen hub” to Pennsylvania. The package was publicly introduced as an amendment to a bill just after 3 p.m. on Oct. 26. Less than six hours later, both the state House and Senate passed the legislation. There was little public debate and no public hearings. The deal cleared the chamber in a late-night vote.

Some 75% of surveyed Americans would jump at a ‘green’ job in solar, wind or EVs, which tend to pay 21% more
Roughly 75% of Americans like the idea of a well-paying, secure job in what some have billed the green Industrial Revolution — a stronger shift in coming months, years and decades to transition the country off traditional energy sources and into sustainable alternatives, a survey out Tuesday shows. That might include wind, solar and nuclear energy, and an upgraded power grid, all areas that require engineers, software developers, solar-panel installers, HVAC technicians, finance professionals and more.

8 billion humans: How population growth and climate change are connected as the ‘Anthropocene engine’ transforms the planet
Fossil fuels powered the Industrial Revolution, and with it, greater wealth and advances in health care. But the age of fossil fuels has had dramatic consequences. It almost doubled the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in less than 300 years, causing the unprecedented speed of global warming that humanity is experiencing today.

How solar farms in space might beam electricity to Earth
“There’s sufficient room in orbit for the solar power satellites, and the Sun’s supply of energy is vast. A narrow strip around geostationary Earth orbit receives more than 100 times the amount of energy per year than all of humanity is forecast to use in 2050,” Mr Soltau says.

Drillers ask U.S. to exempt smallest wells from looming methane rule
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Oil and gas companies have asked the Biden administration to exempt hundreds of thousands of the nation’s smallest wells from upcoming rules requiring drillers to find and plug leaks of methane, according to industry groups, despite studies showing they emit huge amounts of the powerful greenhouse gas.

EXPLAINER-Why methane emissions are threatening climate stability
“If I thought we had 100 years to deal with climate change, I’d be an awful lot more relaxed about it,” Mike Berners-Lee, expert and author on carbon footprints, said. “If you’re interested in the climate impacts, we’ll be experiencing in 2050 … you’d be absolutely screaming about methane emissions.”

U.S. Wind Power Just Crossed an Important Milestone
The last time a renewable energy resource claimed at least 10% of the nation’s power mix was when hydropower accomplished the feat in the late 1980s. That’s about to become a reality again in 2022, except this time it will be onshore wind power instead of hydroelectric dams.

Europe temperatures increased more than twice global average, report says
The impacts of the changing climate will impact people on an individual level, the report warns, as extreme events spawn diseases and mental health issues and exacerbate heat vulnerability. Air pollution, which in the past has been linked to fossil fuel burning, has contributed to about half a million premature deaths in the region, many of which could be prevented with reduced carbon emissions, the report said.

Leave a Reply